http://www.dungeonmastering.com/campaigns-adventures/the-second-game The D&D Blog Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:54:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.dungeonmastering.com/campaigns-adventures/the-second-game#comment-7433 inidkllr Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:06:56 +0000 http://www.dungeonmastering.com/uncategorized/the-second-game#comment-7433 My players love slicing to decapitate or splitting an enemy down the middle from head to crouch...if they succeed. One of our fighters also has a few windups before striking with his sword, which fits his characters personalitly. We're about to quit our 3.5 campaign and start a 4thE campaign, so these are very helpful reminders. My players love slicing to decapitate or splitting an enemy down the middle from head to crouch…if they succeed. One of our fighters also has a few windups before striking with his sword, which fits his characters personalitly.
We’re about to quit our 3.5 campaign and start a 4thE campaign, so these are very helpful reminders.

]]> http://www.dungeonmastering.com/campaigns-adventures/the-second-game#comment-5891 Yax Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:28:07 +0000 http://www.dungeonmastering.com/uncategorized/the-second-game#comment-5891 Yeah, in fact a DM should try to say "yes" as often as possible then figure out how it all affects the story. Crazy, cinematic tumbling king to the heads look cool, and they should be allowed, but it won't kill a monster in one hit and monster should do cool stuff too. Yeah, in fact a DM should try to say “yes” as often as possible then figure out how it all affects the story. Crazy, cinematic tumbling king to the heads look cool, and they should be allowed, but it won’t kill a monster in one hit and monster should do cool stuff too.

]]> http://www.dungeonmastering.com/campaigns-adventures/the-second-game#comment-800 sylvain Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:44:34 +0000 http://www.dungeonmastering.com/uncategorized/the-second-game#comment-800 That's actually a really good idea, allowing any sort of crazy attack, as long as it doesn't functionally become more powerfull, and not assigning it a negative. I don't know how many times a player (this one in particular) has asking if he could do "crazy kick-ass move X", and I've replied: sure, but you'll take -10, have to succeed a tumble check, and give me a dollar. I think I'm going to intall this house rule. That’s actually a really good idea, allowing any sort of crazy attack, as long as it doesn’t functionally become more powerfull, and not assigning it a negative. I don’t know how many times a player (this one in particular) has asking if he could do “crazy kick-ass move X”, and I’ve replied: sure, but you’ll take -10, have to succeed a tumble check, and give me a dollar. I think I’m going to intall this house rule.

]]>