<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D&amp;D 4E review: DRAGONS!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons</link>
	<description>The D&#38;D Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Issac</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Issac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>Hey, I have a Brass in my campaign thats an intimate part of the plot.The players enjoy his prescence and find the dragons character intriguing. Besides its up to the DM to figure out what really differentiates one race from another, dropping creatures which were initally brought in by Dragonlance seems a little like a sad attempt to glam up the game. Cool names and colors don&#039;t make good D&amp;D, its roleplay, game play, and DM attention which make a good game. &quot;If it ain&#039;t broke, leave it alone.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I have a Brass in my campaign thats an intimate part of the plot.The players enjoy his prescence and find the dragons character intriguing. Besides its up to the DM to figure out what really differentiates one race from another, dropping creatures which were initally brought in by Dragonlance seems a little like a sad attempt to glam up the game. Cool names and colors don&#8217;t make good D&amp;D, its roleplay, game play, and DM attention which make a good game. &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t broke, leave it alone.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Lund</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Cutting Brass and Bronze makes sense - they were just alloys of Copper anyway. Silver, Copper, and Gold were pure metallic elements. What&#039;s worse, Bronze was higher on the hierarchy as an alloy-dragon than Copper was as a pure-metal.

Iron and Adamantine are likewise pure metallic elements, and make much more sense to include.

Seriously, I think we&#039;ll be better off with just Copper, Iron, and Adamantine Dragons that than Copper, Copper-diluted-with-Tin, and Copper-diluted-with-Zinc Dragons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting Brass and Bronze makes sense &#8211; they were just alloys of Copper anyway. Silver, Copper, and Gold were pure metallic elements. What&#8217;s worse, Bronze was higher on the hierarchy as an alloy-dragon than Copper was as a pure-metal.</p>
<p>Iron and Adamantine are likewise pure metallic elements, and make much more sense to include.</p>
<p>Seriously, I think we&#8217;ll be better off with just Copper, Iron, and Adamantine Dragons that than Copper, Copper-diluted-with-Tin, and Copper-diluted-with-Zinc Dragons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chatty DM</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chatty DM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>He he he he!

&lt;i&gt;Chatty Whistles innocently&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he he he!</p>
<p><i>Chatty Whistles innocently</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musings of the Chatty DM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mini-Fluff&#8217;N&#8217;Crunch: Requiem for my Bronze Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Musings of the Chatty DM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mini-Fluff&#8217;N&#8217;Crunch: Requiem for my Bronze Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>[...] That perfidious and oh so diabolical Yax has been reading all those &#8220;WotC presents&#8221; books and, through his Red Dragon comic-relief Minion Expy, has announced that our cherished Wizards on the Coast are revamping the dragons. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That perfidious and oh so diabolical Yax has been reading all those &#8220;WotC presents&#8221; books and, through his Red Dragon comic-relief Minion Expy, has announced that our cherished Wizards on the Coast are revamping the dragons. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chatty DM</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chatty DM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>Dragons.... color coded for your convenience...

As always Expy, you are a great comedian... that surprising considering you&#039;re only a Red...

You are so going down too!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragons&#8230;. color coded for your convenience&#8230;</p>
<p>As always Expy, you are a great comedian&#8230; that surprising considering you&#8217;re only a Red&#8230;</p>
<p>You are so going down too!</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave T. Game</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T. Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Copper/Brass/Bronze are nowhere near what I&#039;d call &quot;an integral part of the game.&quot; I&#039;m running a campaign now that uses all the colors of dragon in the Monster Manual, and even I have a hard time keeping them straight as a DM. It&#039;s bad design to have things so visually similar- they should stand out both in personality and in color.

Also, it&#039;s insanely easy to houserule, and we&#039;ll probably see the other colors in some kind of supplement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Copper/Brass/Bronze are nowhere near what I&#8217;d call &#8220;an integral part of the game.&#8221; I&#8217;m running a campaign now that uses all the colors of dragon in the Monster Manual, and even I have a hard time keeping them straight as a DM. It&#8217;s bad design to have things so visually similar- they should stand out both in personality and in color.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s insanely easy to houserule, and we&#8217;ll probably see the other colors in some kind of supplement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yax</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Yax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>The logic behind the change is that few players could actually make the difference between the 3 (copper, brass, bronze).

I have to admit I can&#039;t really tell them apart myself.  Maybe I&#039;m too fixated on Reds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic behind the change is that few players could actually make the difference between the 3 (copper, brass, bronze).</p>
<p>I have to admit I can&#8217;t really tell them apart myself.  Maybe I&#8217;m too fixated on Reds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecrodorias</title>
		<link>http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecrodorias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dungeonmastering.com/gaming-life/dd-4e-review-dragons#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Why drop dragons? Brass Dragons and Bronze dragons have been part of my campaign for years, okay easy to convert over I should imagine, but why not add new stuff rather than removing something thats such an integral part of the game. Most players can name the types of dragons, and in Dragonlance games especially they all have significance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why drop dragons? Brass Dragons and Bronze dragons have been part of my campaign for years, okay easy to convert over I should imagine, but why not add new stuff rather than removing something thats such an integral part of the game. Most players can name the types of dragons, and in Dragonlance games especially they all have significance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->